4.4 Article

Effect of Calcium Dobesilate in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

Journal

CLINICS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2942

Keywords

Calcium dobesilate; Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury; Diabetes Mellitus; Chronic Renal Insufficiency; Coronary Angiography

Funding

  1. Chinese Cardiovascular Association V.G foundation [2017-CCA-VG-021]
  2. clinical medical research project of the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University [2020LC12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with diabetes and CKD, showing no preventive effect. Although there was a slight reduction in SCr levels, no significant differences were observed in CysC and NGAL levels between the experimental and control groups.
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 130 patients with diabetes and CKD estimated glomerular filtration rate: 30-90 mL/min/1.73m(2) were enrolled and included in the analysis. They were divided into experimental (n=65) and control groups (n=65). Patients in the experimental group were administered oral calcium dobesilate (500 mg) three times daily for 2 days before and 3 days after the procedure. The serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean SCr level at 24h after the procedure was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (79.1 +/- 19.6 mmol/L vs. 87.0 +/- 19.3 mmol/L, p=0.023). However, the Cys C and NGAL levels were not significantly different between the two groups at all measurement time points (all p>0.05). The incidence of CIN defined by the SCr level was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (3 [4.6%] vs. 13 [20.0%], p=0.017). However, the incidence of CIN defined by the Cys C level was not statistically different between the two groups (7 [10.8%] vs. 7 [10.8%], p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that calcium dobesilate has no preventive effect against CIN in patients with diabetes and CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available