3.9 Article

Analytical Formulas for Dispersion and Effective Area in Hollow-Core Tube Lattice Fibers

Journal

FIBERS
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fib9100058

Keywords

optical fibers; hollow core fibers; inhibited coupling fibers; fiber properties; dispersion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, analytical formulas were proposed for estimating the dispersion properties and effective area of the fundamental mode of hollow-core inhibited coupling fibers with a microstructured cladding. The formulas were based on a model that has been successfully applied to confinement loss estimation, showing good accuracy without requiring parameter tuning. The proposed formulas also provide a good estimation of parameters for other types of Hollow-core inhibited coupling fibers.
In this work, we propose analytical formulas for the estimation of dispersion properties and effective area of the fundamental mode of hollow-core inhibited coupling fibers with a microstructured cladding composed by a ring of dielectric tubes. The formulas are based on a model which has already been successfully applied to the estimation of confinement loss. The model takes into account the effects of the coupling of the fundamental core mode with the cladding modes in the context of the single-tube approximation. Effective index, group velocity dispersion, and effective area of the fundamental mode are estimated and compared with the results obtained from numerical simulations, by considering ten different fibers. The comparison shows a good accuracy of the proposed formulas, which do not require any tuning of fitting parameters. On the basis of the analysis carried out, a scaling law relating the effective area to the core radius is also given. Finally, the formulas give a good estimation of the same parameters of other Hollow-core inhibited coupling fibers, such as nested, ice-cream, and kagome fibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available