4.7 Article

Effect of Cold Stress on Growth, Physiological Characteristics, and Calvin-Cycle-Related Gene Expression of Grafted Watermelon Seedlings of Different Gourd Rootstocks

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7100391

Keywords

watermelon; rootstock; cold stress; antioxidant enzymes; gene expression

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFE0118900]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY18C06000]
  3. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2017A610293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grafting technology has been used to enhance cold stress tolerance in watermelon, with watermelons grafted onto 2505 and 0526 rootstocks showing higher resilience. The improved cold tolerance was associated with higher chlorophyll and proline content, and lower MDA content in grafted watermelons.
Recently, grafting has been used to improve abiotic stress resistance in crops. Here, using watermelon 'Zaojia 8424' (Citrullus lanatus) as scions, three different gourds (Lagenaria siceraria, 0526, 2505, and 1226) as rootstocks, and non-grafted plants as controls (different plants were abbreviated as 0526, 2505, 1226, and 8424), the effect of cold stress on various physiological and molecular parameters was investigated. The results demonstrate that the improved cold tolerance of gourd-grafted watermelon was associated with higher chlorophyll and proline content, and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content, compared to 8424 under cold stress. Furthermore, grafted watermelons accumulated fewer reactive oxygen species (ROS), accompanied by enhanced antioxidant activity and a higher expression of enzymes related to the Calvin cycle. In conclusion, watermelons with 2505 and 0526 rootstocks were more resilient compared to 1226 and 8424. These results confirm that using tolerant rootstocks may be an efficient adaptation strategy for improving abiotic stress tolerance in watermelon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available