4.7 Article

Overcoming the complexity barrier of the dynamic message-passing method in networks with fat-tailed degree distributions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.045313

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Non-Equilibrium Systems [CANES EP/L015854/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamic cavity method is efficient for evaluating probabilities of dynamic trajectories in systems of stochastic units with unidirectional sparse interactions, but faces challenges related to complexity barriers associated with in-degrees.
The dynamic cavity method provides the most efficient way to evaluate probabilities of dynamic trajectories in systems of stochastic units with unidirectional sparse interactions. It is closely related to sum-product algorithms widely used to compute marginal functions from complicated global functions of many variables, with applications in disordered systems, combinatorial optimization, and computer science. However, the complexity of the cavity approach grows exponentially with the in-degrees of the interacting units, which creates a defacto barrier for the successful analysis of systems with fat-tailed in-degree distributions. In this paper, we present a dynamic programming algorithm that overcomes this barrier by reducing the computational complexity in the in-degrees from exponential to quadratic, whenever couplings are chosen randomly from (or can be approximated in terms of) discrete, possibly unit-dependent, sets of equidistant values. As a case study, we analyze the dynamics of a random Boolean network with a fat-tailed degree distribution and fully asymmetric binary +/- J couplings, and we use the power of the algorithm to unlock the noise-dependent heterogeneity of stationary node activation patterns in such a system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available