4.1 Article

Temporal rainfall trend analysis in different agro-ecological regions of southern Africa

Journal

WATER SA
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 466-479

Publisher

WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION
DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3844

Keywords

agriculture risk; drought; rainfall distribution; rainfed agriculture

Funding

  1. CGIAR Fund Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that rainfall has a significant impact on rainfed smallholder farming systems, with varying trends in different regions. Most locations did not experience significant changes between the 1900s and 2000s.
Rainfall is a major driver of food production in rainfed smallholder farming systems. This study was conducted to assess linear trends in (i) different daily rainfall amounts (<5, 5-10, 11-20, 21-40 and >40 mm.day(-1)), and (ii) monthly and seasonal rainfall amounts. Drought was determined using the rainfall variability index. Daily rainfall data were derived from 18 meteorological stations in southern Africa. Daily rainfall was dominated by <5 mm.day(-1) followed by 5-10 mm.day(-1). Three locations experienced increasing linear trends of <5 mm.day(-1) amounts and two others in sub-humid region had increases in the >40 mm day(-1) category. Semi-arid location experienced increasing trends in <5 and 5-10 mm.day(-1) events. A significant linear trend in seasonal rainfall occurred at two locations with decreasing rainfall (1.24 and 3 mm.season(-1)). A 3 mm.season(-1) decrease in seasonal rainfall was experienced under semi-arid conditions. There were no apparent linear trends in monthly and seasonal rainfall at 15 of the 18 locations studied. Drought frequencies varied with location and were 50% or higher during the November-March growing season. Rainfall trends were location and agro-ecology specific, but most of the locations studied did not experience significant changes between the 1900s and 2000s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available