4.6 Article

In Situ Hybridization of PRRSV-1 Combined with Digital Image Analysis in Lung Tissues of Pigs Challenged with PRRSV-1

Journal

VETERINARY SCIENCES
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8100235

Keywords

porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; RNAscope; in situ hybridization; qRT-PCR; QuPath

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
  2. [TKP2020-NKA-01]
  3. [2020-4.1.1-TKP2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel RNA-based in situ hybridization technique (RNAscope) was developed to detect PRRSV RNA in lung tissues of experimentally infected animals, showing significant association with real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) test results.
Betaarterivirus suid 1 and 2 are the causative agents of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), which is one of the most significant diseases of the swine industry, causing significant economic losses in the main pig producing countries. Here, we report the development of a novel, RNA-based in situ hybridization technique (RNAscope) to detect PRRS virus (PRRSV) RNA in lung tissues of experimentally infected animals. The technique was applied to lung tissues of 20 piglets, which had been inoculated with a wild-type, highly pathogenic PRRSV-1 strain. To determine the RNAscope's applicability as a semi-quantitative method, we analysed the association between the proportion of the virus-infected cells measured with an image analysis software (QuPath) and the outcome of the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) tests performed in parallel. The results of the quantitative approach of these two molecular biological methods show significant association (pseudo R-2 = 0.3894, p = 0.004). This is the first time RNAscope assay has been implemented for the detection of PRRSV-1 in experimental animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available