3.8 Article

Visitor Restrictions, Palliative Care, and Epistemic Agency: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Relational Practice During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Journal

GLOBAL QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/23333936211051702

Keywords

hospice care; palliative care; end of life care; COVID-19; moral agency; nursing ethics; Canada

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that nurses in palliative care understood the necessity of pandemic measures, but believed blanket policies separating patients and families contradicted the values of palliative care. Nurses navigated this tension by integrating safety and humanity into their work through ethical reasoning and action, highlighting the limits of a purely biomedical logic for guiding nursing ethics during the pandemic.
Efforts to curb spread of COVID-19 has led to restrictive visitor policies in healthcare, which disrupt social connection between patients and their families at end of life. We interviewed 17 Canadian nurses providing palliative care, to solicit their descriptions of, and responses to, ethical issues experienced as a result of COVID-19 related circumstances. Our analysis was inductive and scaffolded on notions of nurses' moral agency, palliative care values, and our clinical practice in end-of-life care. Our findings reveal that while participants appreciated the need for pandemic measures, they found blanket policies separating patients and families to be antithetical to their philosophy of palliative care. In navigating this tension, nurses drew on the foundational values of their practice, engaging in ethical reasoning and action to integrate safety and humanity into their work. These findings underscore the epistemic agency of nurses and highlight the limits of a purely biomedical logic for guiding the nursing ethics of the pandemic response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available