4.7 Article

Development of Novel Quinoline-Based Sulfonamides as Selective Cancer-Associated Carbonic Anhydrase Isoform IX Inhibitors

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011119

Keywords

sulfonamides; 4-anilinoquinoline; carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors; anticancer agents; hypoxic tumors

Funding

  1. CNR, Italy
  2. ASRT, Egypt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new series of quinoline-based benzenesulfonamides (QBS) have been developed as potential carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, with para-sulphonamide derivatives showing the best inhibitory activity. In addition, a linker elongation approach and molecular docking simulation studies were used to further investigate the anticancer effects of QBS.
A new series of quinoline-based benzenesulfonamides (QBS) were developed as potential carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs). The target QBS CAIs is based on the 4-anilinoquinoline scaffold where the primary sulphonamide functionality was grafted at C4 of the anilino moiety as a zinc anchoring group (QBS 13a-c); thereafter, the sulphonamide group was switched to ortho- and meta-positions to afford regioisomers 9a-d and 11a-g. Moreover, a linker elongation approach was adopted where the amino linker was replaced by a hydrazide one to afford QBS 16. All the described QBS have been synthesized and investigated for their CA inhibitory action against hCA I, II, IX and XII. In general, para-sulphonamide derivatives 13a-c displayed the best inhibitory activity against both cancer-related isoforms hCA IX (K(I)s = 25.8, 5.5 and 18.6 nM, respectively) and hCA XII (K(I)s = 9.8, 13.2 and 8.7 nM, respectively), beside the excellent hCA IX inhibitory activity exerted by meta-sulphonamide derivative 11c (K-I = 8.4 nM). The most promising QBS were further evaluated for their anticancer and pro-apoptotic activities on two cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7). In addition, molecular docking simulation studies were applied to justify the acquired CA inhibitory action of the target QBS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available