Journal
BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa273
Keywords
alternative polyadenylation; single-cell RNA-seq; 3 ' untranslated region; RNA processing; software
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871463, 61573296, 61802323]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
APA plays a crucial role in transcriptome diversity and gene expression regulation. The newly developed tool scAPAtrap can accurately identify poly(A) sites at the whole genome level in individual cells, even for sites with low read coverage, without relying on priori genome annotation. Compared to existing methods, scAPAtrap shows higher accuracy and sensitivity in identifying poly(A) sites, making it a valuable tool for exploring APA dynamics and heterogeneous APA isoform expression at the single-cell level.
Alternative polyadenylation (APA) generates diverse mRNA isoforms, which contributes to transcriptome diversity and gene expression regulation by affecting mRNA stability, translation and localization in cells. The rapid development of 3' tag-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies, such as CEL-seq and 10x Genomics, has led to the emergence of computational methods for identifying APA sites and profiling APA dynamics at single-cell resolution. However, existing methods fail to detect the precise location of poly(A) sites or sites with low read coverage. Moreover, they rely on priori genome annotation and can only detect poly(A) sites located within or near annotated genes. Here we proposed a tool called scAPAtrap for detecting poly(A) sites at the whole genome level in individual cells from 3' tag-based scRNA-seq data. scAPAtrap incorporates peak identification and poly(A) read anchoring, enabling the identification of the precise location of poly(A) sites, even for sites with low read coverage. Moreover, scAPAtrap can identify poly(A) sites without using priori genome annotation, which helps locate novel poly(A) sites in previously overlooked regions and improve genome annotation. We compared scAPAtrap with two latest methods, scAPA and Sierra, using scRNA-seq data from different experimental technologies and species. Results show that scAPAtrap identified poly(A) sites with higher accuracy and sensitivity than competing methods and could be used to explore APA dynamics among cell types or the heterogeneous APA isoform expression in individual cells. scAPAtrap is available at https://github.com/BMILAB/scAPAtrap.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available