3.8 Proceedings Paper

Design of a 1-to-4 Subarray Element for Wireless Subharmonic Injection in the THz Band

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/IWMTS51331.2021.9486781

Keywords

subharmonic transmitarray; power combination; wireless subharmonic injection; THz; antenna-in-antenna oscillator

Funding

  1. European Union [765426]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center CRCffRR SFB 196 MARIE [287022738]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a 1 to 4 subarray element for wireless subharmonic injection in on-chip antennas, achieving a maximum radiation efficiency better than 50% through optimizing the positions and distances between FOS and SIS antennas.
This paper presents an on-chip 1 to 4 subarray element for wireless subharmonic injection (WSI) in the context of antenna-in-antenna THz oscillators. The proposed antenna receives the third-order subharmonic injection signal (SIS) at tllil GHz from one side and radiates the 300 GHz fundamental oscillation signal (FOS) to the opposite side, which performs like a subharmonic transmitarray. Each element is consisted of a single SIS receiving antenna (Receiver antenna, RA) connected with a 2x2 FOS array (Transmitter antenna, TA). By positioning more FOS antenna around the single SIS antenna, the element spacing at 300 GHz is shorted within one wavelength which inhibits the grating lobe. Through tuning the distance of the FOS array element, the surface wave in the thick indium phosphide (InP) substrate is also reduced to some degree. The simulation results show that the maximum radiation efficiency of the designed chip antenna structure is better than 50% in both the 100 GHz and the 300 GHz band. The conjugate impedance matching in the dual-band is achieved according to the active element requirement. Utilizing the antenna proposed in this work, a low injection loss is verified in the periodical boundary based WSI simulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available