4.0 Article

Is periapical surgery follow-up with only two-dimensional radiographs reliable? A retrospective cohort type sensitivity study

Journal

MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages E711-E718

Publisher

MEDICINA ORAL S L
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24447

Keywords

Periapical radiography; panoramic radiography; CBCT; sensitivity; treatment outcome; size of periapical radiolucency; area; volume

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective cohort study compared the sensitivity and accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT in measuring the area and volume of periapical lesions. The results showed that periapical radiography had higher sensitivity than panoramic radiography both preoperatively and postoperatively, while CBCT measurements indicated larger lesion volumes compared to those obtained from periapical and panoramic radiographs.
Background: Two-dimensional (2D) radiographic techniques are commonly used for assessing lesion prognosis after endodontic surgery. The present retrospective cohort study analyzes the sensitivity and ability of different radiographic techniques in obtaining area and volume measurements of periapical lesions. Material and Methods: Preoperative and follow-up (6-48 months) periapical and panoramic radiographs (index test) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (reference standard) were selected from an endodontic microsurgery database. Sensitivity was analyzed independently by two examiners. The areas of the 2D radiographic images and CBCT volumes were studied using Itk-Snap software and Romexis viewer. Results: The sample comprised 105 patients and 105 teeth, with a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 6-48). Preoperatively, CBCT detected all the periapical areas, periapical radiography detected 67, and panoramic radiography detected 60. Postoperatively, of the 52 cases in which CBCT detected remains of the periapical area, periapical radiography detected 22, and panoramic radiography detected 17. The measurements of the areas obtained by the 2D methods, and the volumes obtained by CBCT, had to be transformed into linear measures for comparison purposes. The measurements were found to be significantly different in both the preoperative and the follow-up images. Conclusions: Periapical radiography showed greater sensitivity than panoramic radiography, both preoperatively and at follow-up. The lesions measured with CBCT were larger, with significant differences than as evidenced by the periapical and panoramic radiographs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available