4.1 Article

Gridded GDP Projections Compatible With the Five SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways)

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.760306

Keywords

shared socioeconomic pathways; gross domestic product; downscale; 1; 12-degree grid scale; spatial econometrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to estimate GDP in high resolution and long term using various geographic data, and the results suggest that the spatial pattern of urban and peri-urban GDP varies considerably under different shared socioeconomic pathways.
Historical and future spatially explicit population and gross domestic product (GDP) data are essential for the analysis of future climate risks. Unlike population projections that are generally available, GDP projections-particularly for scenarios compatible with shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs)-are limited. Our objective is to perform a high-resolution and long-term GDP estimation under SSPs utilizing a wide variety of geographic auxiliary information. We estimated the GDP in a 1/12-degree grid scale. The estimation is done through downscaling of historical GDP data for 1850-2010 and SSP future scenario data for 2010-2100. In the downscaling, we first modeled the spatial and economic interactions among cities and projected different future urban growth patterns according to the SSPs. Subsequently, the projected patterns and other auxiliary geographic data were used to estimate the gridded GDP distributions. Finally, the GDP projections were visualized via three-dimensional mapping to enhance the clarity for multiple stakeholders. Our results suggest that the spatial pattern of urban and peri-urban GDP depends considerably on the SSPs; the GDP of the existing major cities grew rapidly under SSP1, moderately grew under SSP 2 and SSP4, slowly grew under SSP3, and dispersed growth under SSP5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available