4.0 Article

General practitioner knowledge of and engagement with telehealth-at-home medical abortion provision

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 456-461

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/PY20297

Keywords

induced abortion; general practice; telehealth; telemedicine; medical abortion; qualitative research; reproductive services; health service access

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Australia, there are significant barriers to abortion, especially for women in remote areas. While there is widespread support for telehealth-at-home abortion, GPs lack knowledge and understanding of the process involved in medical abortion.
In Australia, there are many barriers to abortion, particularly for women living in regional, rural and remote areas. Telehealth provision of medical abortion is safe, effective and acceptable to patients and providers. In 2015, Marie Stopes Australia (MSA) launched an at-home telehealth model for medical abortion to which GPs could refer. Between April and November of 2017, we interviewed 20 GPs who referred patients to MSA's telehealth-at-home abortion service to better understand their experiences and perspectives regarding telehealth-at-home abortion. We found that there was widespread support and recognition of the benefits of telehealth-at-home abortion in increasing access to abortion and reducing travel and costs. However, the GPs interviewed lacked knowledge and understanding of the processes involved in medical abortion, and many were unaware of the availability of telehealth as an option until a patient requested a referral. The GPs interviewed called for increased communication between telehealth-at-home abortion providers and GPs. Increasing GP familiarity with medical abortion and awareness of the availability of telehealth-at-home abortion may assist people in accessing safe, effective medical abortion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available