Journal
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 456-461Publisher
CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/PY20297
Keywords
induced abortion; general practice; telehealth; telemedicine; medical abortion; qualitative research; reproductive services; health service access
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In Australia, there are significant barriers to abortion, especially for women in remote areas. While there is widespread support for telehealth-at-home abortion, GPs lack knowledge and understanding of the process involved in medical abortion.
In Australia, there are many barriers to abortion, particularly for women living in regional, rural and remote areas. Telehealth provision of medical abortion is safe, effective and acceptable to patients and providers. In 2015, Marie Stopes Australia (MSA) launched an at-home telehealth model for medical abortion to which GPs could refer. Between April and November of 2017, we interviewed 20 GPs who referred patients to MSA's telehealth-at-home abortion service to better understand their experiences and perspectives regarding telehealth-at-home abortion. We found that there was widespread support and recognition of the benefits of telehealth-at-home abortion in increasing access to abortion and reducing travel and costs. However, the GPs interviewed lacked knowledge and understanding of the processes involved in medical abortion, and many were unaware of the availability of telehealth as an option until a patient requested a referral. The GPs interviewed called for increased communication between telehealth-at-home abortion providers and GPs. Increasing GP familiarity with medical abortion and awareness of the availability of telehealth-at-home abortion may assist people in accessing safe, effective medical abortion.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available