4.2 Article

A Preliminary Study of Microplastic Abrasion from the Screw Cap System of Reusable Plastic Bottles by Raman Microspectroscopy

Journal

ACS ES&T WATER
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 1363-1368

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.0c00238

Keywords

Raman microspectroscopy; microplastic; mineral water; plastic bottles; screw cap system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The packaging material of bottled water is suspected to be a source of microplastics (MP). This preliminary study focused on the screw cap system in particular for its potential release of microplastics. The results showed that with increased opening and closing of the bottles, there was a significant increase in the release of PP particles, while the concentrations of PE and PET particles remained relatively stable.
The packaging material of bottled water is suspected to be a source of microplastics (MP). In this preliminary study, the screw cap system was examined for its MP release potential. Therefore, the concentration of MP (>= 10 mu m) was determined in reusable polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles with polypropylene (PP) caps and polyethylene (PE) seals after opening and closing once and 11 times. The entire contents of the bottles were filtered onto a silicon filter after opening. The inside of the bottles and caps was rinsed with filtered water. The total Si filter area was analyzed by Raman microspectroscopy. After one opening, 131 +/- 25 microplastic particles (MPP) per liter were detected. After 11 openings and closings, 242 +/- 64 MPP/L were detected. The increase is caused by a significant increase in the number of PP particles from 100 +/- 27 to 185 +/- 52 MPP/L. The concentration of PE and PET particles did not change significantly. Regardless of polymer type and the number of openings and closings, 80% of the MPP were identified in the smallest size class investigated (10-50 mu m). Using a specially developed method, the concentration of MPP was determined before the screw cap system was opened and did not differ from the procedural blank.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available