3.8 Proceedings Paper

Quantized Gromov-Wasserstein

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86523-8_49

Keywords

Gromov-Wasserstein distance; Optimal transport; Metric space registration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) framework allows for comparing probability distributions on different metric spaces, with recent algorithms enabling scalable computation of GW distances. The newly defined Quantized Gromov Wasserstein (qGW) introduces a metric treating parts as fundamental objects and fitting into a hierarchy of theoretical upper bounds. This formulation leads to a new algorithm for approximating optimal GW matchings, resulting in algorithmic speedups and reductions in memory complexity, allowing application at larger scales than previously seen in the literature.
The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) framework adapts ideas from optimal transport to allow for the comparison of probability distributions defined on different metric spaces. Scalable computation of GW distances and associated matchings on graphs and point clouds have recently been made possible by state-of-the-art algorithms such as S-GWL and MREC. Each of these algorithmic breakthroughs relies on decomposing the underlying spaces into parts and performing matchings on these parts, adding recursion as needed. While very successful in practice, theoretical guarantees on such methods are limited. Inspired by recent advances in the theory of quantization for metric measure spaces, we define Quantized Gromov Wasserstein (qGW): a metric that treats parts as fundamental objects and fits into a hierarchy of theoretical upper bounds for the GW problem. This formulation motivates a new algorithm for approximating optimal GW matchings which yields algorithmic speedups and reductions in memory complexity. Consequently, we are able to go beyond outperforming state-of-the-art and apply GW matching at scales that are an order of magnitude larger than in the existing literature, including datasets containing over 1M points.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available