Transformers: The End of History for Natural Language Processing?

Recent advances in neural architectures, such as the Transformer, coupled with the emergence of large-scale pre-trained models such as BERT, have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), pushing the state of the art for a number of NLP tasks. A rich family of variations of these models has been proposed, such as RoBERTa, ALBERT, and XLNet, but fundamentally, they all remain limited in their ability to model certain kinds of information, and they cannot cope with certain information sources, which was easy for preexisting models. Thus, here we aim to shed light on some important theoretical limitations of pre-trained BERT-style models that are inherent in the general Transformer architecture. First, we demonstrate in practice on two general types of tasks-segmentation and segment labeling-and on four datasets that these limitations are indeed harmful and that addressing them, even in some very simple and naive ways, can yield sizable improvements over vanilla RoBERTa and XLNet models. Then, we offer a more general discussion on desiderata for future additions to the Transformer architecture that would increase its expressiveness, which we hope could help in the design of the next generation of deep NLP architectures.

Automated summary

Recent advancements in neural architectures, such as Transformer, and the emergence of large-scale pre-trained models like BERT have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, current models still have limitations in modeling certain types of information. By demonstrating and discussing these limitations, it is possible to find ways to improve model performance and explore desired enhancements for future Transformer architectures.