4.6 Article

Effects of Selenium treatment on cardiac function in Chagas heart disease: Results from the STCC randomized Trial

Journal

ECLINICALMEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101105

Keywords

Selenium; Trypanosoma cruzi; Chagas disease; cardiopathy; biomarkers

Funding

  1. Department of the Industrial Complex and Innovation in Health from the Brazilian Health Ministry (IOC Fiotec) [IOC-001-LIV-11-2-1, 25380.001603/2017-89]
  2. CNPq [306184/2010-9, 309545/20145, 313011/2018-4]
  3. FAPERJ [E26/151.506/99, 33]
  4. Innovation and the Research Vice-Presidencies of Fiocruz
  5. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal do Ensino Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The selenium treatment did not significantly improve cardiac function in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy patients, although a potential beneficial influence of selenium was observed in the subgroup of patients at stage B2. Further studies exploring diverse selenium doses and associations in different stages of chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy are needed.
Background: Chagas disease (caused by Trypanosoma cruzi infection) evolves to chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) affecting 1.8 million people worldwide. This is the first randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, clinical trial designed to estimate efficacy and safety of selenium (Se) treatment in CCC. Methods: 66 patients with CCC stages B1 (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] > 45% and no heart failure; n = 54) or B2 (LVEF < 45% and no heart failure; n = 12) were randomly assigned to receive 100 mcg/day sodium selenite (Se, n = 32) or placebo (Pla, n = 34) for one year (study period: May 2014-September 2018). LVEF changes over time and adverse effects were investigated. Trial registration number: NCT00875173 (clinicaltrials.gov). Findings: No significant differences between the two groups were observed for the primary outcome: mean LVEF after 6 (beta= +1.1 p = 0.51 for Se vs Pla) and 12 months (beta= +2.1; p = 0.23). In a subgroup analysis, statistically significant longitudinal changes were observed for mean LVEF in the stage B2 subgroup (beta= +10.1; p = 0.02 for Se [n = 4] vs Pla [n = 8]). Se treatment was safe for CCC patients, and the few adverse effects observed were similarly distributed across the two groups. Interpretation: Se treatment did not improve cardiac function (evaluated from LVEF) in CCC. However, in the subgroup of patients at B2 stage, a potential beneficial influence of Se was observed. Complementary studies are necessary to explore diverse Se dose and/or associations in different CCC stages (B2 and C), as well as in A and B1 stages with longer follow-up. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available