4.6 Article

Quasiparticle band structures of the 4d perovskite oxides SrZrO3 and BaZrO3

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 104, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.195129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1506669, DMREF-1626967]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11929401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the quasiparticle band structures of two 4d transition metal oxides and shows that fully converged GW calculations can accurately predict their properties. The results also indicate that for 4d TMOs, DFT methods can provide good descriptions compared to 3d TMOs.
Although the challenge of GW calculations of the quasiparticle properties of 3d transition metal oxides (TMOs) is well recognized, TMOs involving 4d electrons may be considered borderline systems and have received less attention. Here we present the quasiparticle band structures of SrZrO3 and BaZrO3, two relatively simple wide band gap oxides for which accurate calculations of the electronic structure are scarce despite their technological importance. We show that fully converged GW calculations can accurately predict the quasiparticle properties of 4d TMO perovskites SrZrO3 and BaZrO3, regardless of the starting mean-field solution being calculated within straightforward density functional theory (DFT) or the DFT+U method. This is in contrast to the cases of 3d TMO perovskites SrTiO3 and BaTiO3, for which the DFT+U method is shown to provide a much better starting point for subsequent GW calculations. Compared with the fairly localized 3d states, the more extended 4d orbitals seem to be well described within DFT using local or semilocal functionals. Our results reaffirm the accuracy and robustness of the GW method provided that faithful zeroth-order mean-field solutions are available, and that the results are adequately converged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available