4.5 Article

Field testing two flux footprint models

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 7147-7152

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-7147-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation [32860]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [2018-05717]
  3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Program 2) [AGGP2-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two micrometeorological flux footprint models were used to calculate gas emission rate, both underestimating the actual release rate by approximately 30%, with large variability in accuracy but no statistical differences observed overall.
A field study was undertaken to investigate the accuracy of two micrometeorological flux footprint models for calculating the gas emission rate from a synthetic 10 x 10 m surface area source, based on the vertical flux of gas measured at fetches of 15 to 50 m downwind of the source. Calculations were made with an easy-to-use tool based on the Kormann-Meixner analytical model and with a more sophisticated Lagrangian stochastic dispersion model. A total of 59 testable 10 min observation periods were measured over 9 d. On average, both models underestimated the actual release rate by approximately 30 %, mostly due to large underestimates at the larger fetches. The accuracy of the model calculations had large period-to-period variability, and no statistical differences were observed between the two models in terms of overall accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available