4.1 Article

Spontaneous Healing of Iatrogenic Complete Ureteric Transection Injury

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19440

Keywords

reconstrictive urology; genito-urinary pathology; post hysterotomy complication; iatrogenic ureteric injury; ureteric trauma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iatrogenic ureteric injury, often caused by gynecological or urological surgical procedures, requires repair based on timely diagnosis. Conservative waiting and delayed ureteric repair may be advisable for similar injuries to allow for resolution of postoperative inflammation and spontaneous healing.
Iatrogenic ureteric injury is the most common cause of ureteric injury. It is usually caused by either gynecological or urological surgical procedures. Iatrogenic ureteric injury repair depends mainly on the time of diagnosis. We represent here a case of iatrogenic complete transection ureteric injury resulted from laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The patient had a history of abdominal hysterectomy causing adhesions that resulted in challenging surgery. One week later, the patient presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, and contrast CT showed left hydronephrosis with extravasation of the contrast at the left renal pelvis. The patient was treated initially with left nephrostomy and an antegrade nephrostogram confirmed the diagnosis of complete transection ureteric injury. Surprisingly, left retrograde study, which was done 11 weeks after the operative injury, showed healing of the ureteric injury with a small annular stricture. The stricture was dilated and a stent was inserted. We concluded that conservative waiting and delayed ureteric repair might be advised in similar injuries allowing time for resolution of the postoperative inflammatory reaction and spontaneous healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available