4.2 Article

Pore Network Modeling to Study the Impacts of Geometric Parameters on Water Transport inside Gas Diffusion Layers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 1717-1730

Publisher

ISFAHAN UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.47176/jafm.14.06.32369

Keywords

Fuel cells; Gas diffusion layer; Two-phase flow; Pore network modeling; Capillary fingering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pore network model (PNM) is used to simulate water transport within the cathode side gas diffusion layer (GDL) of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). The study reveals that GDL thickness and current collector rib width have significant effects on water transport dynamics.
A pore network model (PNM) is proposed for the simulation of water transport inside the cathode side gas diffusion layer (GDL) of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) during the transient start-up period as well as the steady state. Numerous two-dimensional random networks representing GDL are generated followed by statistical averaging of the results (Monte Carlo methods) to circumvent the uncertainties imposed by random pore size distributions. The resulting liquid water saturation profiles within GDLs exhibit concave patterns which is typically encountered in capillary fingering flow regimes in porous media. The effect of GDL thickness and current collector rib width as two geometric parameters on water transport dynamics are separately investigated. It turns out that thin and thick GDLs compared to the base case can have contradicting outcomes on the account of total water saturation in the network. On the other hand, wide current collector ribs give rise to liquid water saturation and build-up within GDL which can lead to flooding. At the end, three-dimensional networks are generated demonstrating higher pore connectivity which results in higher percolation times and different invasion patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available