4.3 Article

Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework for Novel Genetically Engineered Organisms and Gene Drives

Journal

REGULATION & GOVERNANCE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1144-1165

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rego.12245

Keywords

gene drive; gene editing; GMO; governance; risk analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article introduces a new framework for improving risk assessments of novel genetically engineered organisms (GEOs). It demonstrates the application of this framework using a genetically engineered mosquito as a case study.
In this article, a new framework for improving risk assessments of novel genetically engineered organisms (GEOs) is developed and applied. The Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework (PRRAF) provides a set of principles and criteria for assessing and enhancing risk assessment protocols for GEOs under conditions of high uncertainty. The application of PRRAF is demonstrated using the case of a genetically engineered mosquito designed to kill its wild population and therefore decrease disease transmission. Assessments for regulatory approval of this genetically engineered insect fall short of several PPRAF criteria under the principles of humility, procedural validity, inclusion, anticipation, and reflexivity. With the emergence of GEOs designed to spread in ecosystems, such as those with gene drives, it will become increasingly important for regulatory agencies and technology developers to bolster their risk analysis methods and processes prior to field testing. PRRAF can be used as a flexible guide for doing so within a variety of institutional, regulatory, and governance contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available