4.7 Article

A two stage approach for supplier selection problem in multi-item/multi-supplier environment with quantity discounts

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.02.026

Keywords

Supplier selection; Multi-item/multi-supplier; Quantity discounts; F-AHP; MILP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supplier selection, which is the basic process of finding the best supplier/suppliers to procure the items regarding various criteria, is an important decision problem to be studied. It becomes more complicated if there are various items and any supplier cannot provide all types of items individually. Such situations are called multi-item, multi-supplier environments and rarely studied in the literature. In addition, when quantity discounts are also considered, it gets more sophisticated. Although there are several studies dealing with these aspects separately, to the best knowledge of the authors, this study is the first candidate attempting to solve this type of problem with an integrated approach including Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) and Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model. This study mainly operates in two stages. In the first stage, the relative weights of each criterion for each type of item are determined via F-AHP technique. In the second stage, these outputs are used as inputs in the MILP model to determine the suppliers and the quantities to be provided. In order to validate the model, an application is performed in a gear motor company and numerical results of the problem are revealed to select the best suppliers among 6 alternatives, for the procurement of 5 items regarding 4 criteria, namely, price, quality, delivery time performance, and after sales performance, in case of quantity discounts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available