3.9 Article

Crop producers' technical efficiency and its determinants in Gurage zone, Ethiopia: A comparative analysis using rural-urban migration as a parameter

Journal

COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2021.1995996

Keywords

TE; determinants; comparative analysis; SF; Gurage zone; Ethiopia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the technical efficiency of crop-producing households in Gurage Zone, Ethiopia, and the factors influencing it. It compares rural-urban migration as a measure and finds that age of the household head and distance from a neighboring town have negative impact on technical inefficiency, while factors such as schooling, soil infertility, migratory experience, and proximity to a market have positive effects on technical efficiency. Recommendations include optimizing agricultural inputs, improving soil fertility, and addressing technological inefficiencies.
In this study the technical efficiency of crop-producing households and the factors that influence it are explored, and comparisons are made using rural-urban migration as a comparative measure, in Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. The data were collected from 384 arbitrary picked rural households and analyzed using a stochastic frontier approach. Non-migrant households, migrant-sending households, and total samples had mean technical efficiency of 45.5%, 72.3%, and 57.4%, respectively, according to the findings. The household head's age and distance from a neighboring town have a downbeat impact on technical inefficiency, whereas schooling, soil infertility, migratory experience, and distance to a nearby market have an upbeat upshot. With the diversified and specific solutions provided, the study is recommended the government body to focus on making the best use of available agricultural inputs, boosting soil fertility, and regulating the sources of technological inefficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available