4.0 Article

Shaking settings to reduce the breakdown of Entisol fragile particles in texture analysis

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
DOI: 10.36783/18069657rbcs20210066

Keywords

saprolite fragments; physical dispersion; marginal soils; Neossolos

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through experiments, it was found that the best setting to optimize particle dispersion and minimize changes in particle size distribution was using a horizontal shaker at 150 cycles min(-1) for 1 to 2 hours without using nylon spheres.
Finding the proper shaking setting to ensure total particle dispersion without altering the content of sand, silt and clay in soils composed of fragile particles such as saprolite fragments is still a research gap. This study aimed to identify the best shaking setting to optimize particle dispersion and minimize particle change in samples of Entisol (Neossolos). Samples were dispersed using an electric mixer at 12,000 rpm for 5, 15, 30 and 60 min, a horizontal shaker at 150 cycles min(-1) for 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 h with and without the use of nylon spheres, and an ultrasonic shaker at 70 and 110 J mL(-1) for approximately 20 and 30 min, respectively. All the treatments affected particle distribution. Coarse sand reduced up to 14 % and clay content increased up to 18 % with the horizontal shaker with nylon spheres and the electric mixer. These changes were attributed to the breakdown of saprolite fragments, which represented around 1/3 of the coarse sand. Our results showed that the best setting was the horizontal shaker at 150 cycles min(-1) for 1 to 2 h without using nylon spheres. This option allowed optimizing particle dispersion and minimizing changes in particle size distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available