4.5 Article

Kinetic modelling of the solid-liquid extraction process of polyphenolic compounds from apple pomace: influence of solvent composition and temperature

Journal

BIORESOURCES AND BIOPROCESSING
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00465-4

Keywords

Apple pomace; Polyphenolic compounds; First-order kinetic model; Second-order kinetic model; Waste valorization; Value extraction

Funding

  1. Wallonia-Brussels International via the Wallonie-Bruxelles International (WBI) excellence Postdoctoral fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the extraction of total polyphenolic compounds from apple pomace using different solvents and temperatures, and analyzed the extraction mechanism and parameters through kinetic models. The second-order kinetic model was found to adequately describe the extraction process.
This study aims to assess kinetic modelling of the solid-liquid extraction process of total polyphenolic compounds (TPC) from apple pomace (AP). In this regard, we investigated the effects of temperature and solvent (i.e. water, ethanol, and acetone) on TPC extraction over various periods. The highest TPC yield of 11.1 +/- 0.49 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g db (dry basis) was achieved with a mixture of 65% acetone-35% water (v/v) at 60 degrees C. The kinetics of the solvent-based TPC extraction processes were assessed via first-order and second-order kinetic models, with an associated investigation of the kinetic parameters and rate constants, saturation concentrations, and activation energies. The second-order kinetic model was sufficient to describe the extraction mechanism of TPC from AP. This study provides an understanding of the mass transfer mechanism involved in the polyphenolic compound extraction process, thus facilitating future large-scale design, optimization, and process control to valorize pomace waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available