3.9 Article

Resolving Io's Volcanoes from a Mutual Event Observation at the Large Binocular Telescope

Journal

PLANETARY SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/PSJ/ac28fe

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. US NSF [NSF AST-0705296]
  3. NASA PAST grant [80NSSC19K0868]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations with high spatial resolution at various active volcanic sites on Io have provided insights into lava flow coverage and distinct emitting regions within volcanic centers. The emission from two volcanoes with previous eruptions was resolved into multiple distinct regions, shedding light on the temporal evolution of these eruptions from other observations.
Unraveling the geological processes ongoing at Io's numerous sites of active volcanism requires high spatial resolution to, for example, measure the areal coverage of lava flows or identify the presence of multiple emitting regions within a single volcanic center. In de Kleer et al. (2017) we described observations with the Large Binocular Telescope during an occultation of Io by Europa at similar to 6:17 UT on 2015 March 8 and presented a map of the temperature distribution within Loki Patera derived from these data. Here we present emission maps of three other volcanic centers derived from the same observation: Pillan Patera, Kurdalagon Patera, and the vicinity of Ulgen Patera/PV59/N Lerna Regio. The emission is localized by the light curves and resolved into multiple distinct emitting regions in two of the cases. Both Pillan and Kurdalagon Paterae had undergone eruptions in the months prior to our observations, and the location and intensity of the emission are interpreted in the context of the temporal evolution of these eruptions observed from other facilities. The emission from Kurdalagon Patera is resolved into two distinct emitting regions separated by only a few degrees in latitude that were unresolved by Keck observations from the same month.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available