4.5 Article

Architectural geometry

Journal

COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 145-164

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2014.11.002

Keywords

Discrete differential geometry; Fabrication-aware design; Paneling; Support structures; Polyhedral patterns; Statics-aware design

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23735-N13]
  2. DFG-Collaborative Research Center, TRR 109 Discretization in Geometry and Dynamics, through FWF [TRR 109, I705-N26, I706-N26]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 706, P 23735] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Around 2005 it became apparent in the geometry processing community that freeform architecture contains many problems of a geometric nature to be solved, and many opportunities for optimization which however require geometric understanding. This area of research, which has been called architectural geometry, meanwhile contains a great wealth of individual contributions which are relevant in various fields. For mathematicians, the relation to discrete differential geometry is significant, in particular the integrable system viewpoint. Besides, new application contexts have become available for quite some old-established concepts. Regarding graphics and geometry processing, architectural geometry yields interesting new questions but also new objects, e.g. replacing meshes by other combinatorial arrangements. Numerical optimization plays a major role but in itself would be powerless without geometric understanding. Summing up, architectural geometry has become a rewarding field of study. We here survey the main directions which have been pursued, we show real projects where geometric considerations have played a role, and we outline open problems which we think are significant for the future development of both theory and practice of architectural geometry. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available