4.5 Review

Systematic review of risk prediction scores for surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection following joint arthroplasty

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 145, Issue 9, Pages 1738-1749

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268817000486

Keywords

Bone infections; epidemiology; risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under Programme Grants for Applied Research program [RP-PG-1210-12005]
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10048, RP-PG-1210-12005] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-1210-12005] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate identification of individuals at high risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) or periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) influences clinical decisions and development of preventive strategies. We aimed to determine progress in the development and validation of risk prediction models for SSI or PJI using a systematic review. We searched for studies that have developed or validated a risk prediction tool for SSI or PJI following joint replacement in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases; trial registers and reference lists of studies up to September 2016. Nine studies describing 16 risk scores for SSI or PJI were identified. The number of component variables in a risk score ranged from 4 to 45. The C-index ranged from 0.56 to 0.74, with only three risk scores reporting a discriminative ability of >0.70. Five risk scores were validated internally. The National Healthcare Safety Network SSIs risk models for hip and knee arthroplasties (HPRO and KPRO) were the only scores to be externally validated. Except for HPRO which shows some promise for use in a clinical setting (based on predictive performance and external validation), none of the identified risk scores can be considered ready for use. Further research is urgently warranted within the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available