Journal
BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages 6229-6244Publisher
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-6229-2021
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation [1313820, G181115100]
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1313820] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Savanna fires play a significant role in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in West Africa where accurate estimates are lacking. Research shows that head fires have much higher methane emission factors compared to backfires, contributing to significant differences in emission densities.
Savanna fires contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. While it is recognized that these fires play a critical role in the global methane cycle, there are too few accurate estimates of emissions from West Africa, the continent's most active fire region. Most estimates of methane emissions contain high levels of uncertainty as they are based on generalizations of diverse landscapes that are burned by complex fire regimes. To improve estimates we used an approach grounded in the burning practices of people who set fires to working landscapes. We collected and analyzed smoke samples for 36 experimental fires using a canister method for the early dry season (EDS) and mid-dry season (MDS). We also collected data for savanna type, grass type, biomass composition and amount consumed, scorch height, speed of fire front, fire type, and ambient air conditions for two sites in Mali. We report values for fire intensity, combustion completeness, patchiness, modified combustion efficiency (MCE), emission factor (EF) and methane emission density. Our study found that mean methane EFs ranged from 3.83 g kg(-1) in the EDS to 3.18 g kg(-1) in the MDS, but the small sample did not provide enough power for this effect to be significant. We found head fires had nearly double the CH4 EF of backfires (5.12 g kg(-1) to 2.74), a significant difference. Byram's fire intensity was a significant driver of CH4 EF but with weak effect. Methane emission density increased marginally from 0.839 gm(-2) in the EDS to 0.875 gm(-2) in the MDS, a difference that was not significant. Head fires, however, had much higher emission densities than backfires - 1.203 vs. 0.708 gm(-2) - respectively, a significant difference. We suggest the reason for the higher methane emissions from head fires, which have higher intensity, is the longer flame lengths that burn green leaves on trees, releasing methane. We conclude that policies aimed at shifting the burning regime earlier to reduce methane emissions will not have the desired effects, especially if fire type is not considered. Future research should consider the state and amount of leafy biomass combusted in savanna fires.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available