4.6 Article

Biases in Randomized Trials A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 54-59

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000564

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 AI102634]
  2. Methods Innovation Fund grant from the Cochrane Collaboration
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10168]
  4. MRC [MR/M025209/1, MR/K025643/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA134294] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI102634] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/M025209/1, MR/K025643/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0616-10111] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trialists and epidemiologists often employ different terminology to refer to biases in randomized trials and observational studies, even though many biases have a similar structure in both types of study. We use causal diagrams to represent the structure of biases, as described by Cochrane for randomized trials, and provide a translation to the usual epidemiologic terms of confounding, selection bias, and measurement bias. This structural approach clarifies that an explicit description of the inferential goal-the intention-to-treat effect or the per-protocol effect-is necessary to assess risk of bias in the estimates. Being aware of each other's terminologies will enhance communication between trialists and epidemiologists when considering key concepts and methods for causal inference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available