4.7 Article

Cryopreservation of Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Axillary Buds from In Vitro Shoots Using the Droplet Vitrification Method

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7110494

Keywords

in vitro culture; length of dehydration; PVS2; PVS3; regrowth; rooting

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture (Mipaaf), National project Plant Genetic Resources/Implementation of the FAO International Treaty (RGV-FAO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cryopreservation by droplet vitrification was applied to hazelnut axillary buds, with the highest regrowth percentage obtained after applying PVS3 for 60 minutes. Cold pre-treatment on the mother plant did not significantly improve overall regrowth, and the cryopreservation process did not decline the rooting ability of the recovered shoots.
Cryopreservation by droplet vitrification was applied to hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). axillary buds of the Italian cultivated variety Tonda Gentile Romana, which were collected from in vitro growing shoots, immersed in ice cooled PVS2 or PVS3 for 60 or 90 min, then transferred to a droplet of vitrification solution, placed on a strip of aluminium foil, and plunged into liquid nitrogen (LN). Additionally, the effect on the recovery of the mother plant after cryopreservation was evaluated, following a cold pre-treatment at 4 & DEG;C for 3 months. The highest regrowth percentage (56.7%) was obtained after applying PVS3 for 60 min, while the application of PVS2 for the same amount of time reduced regrowth to 41.5%. Increasing the exposure to vitrification solutions to 90 min reduced regrowth to 43.3% when PVS3 was applied, and 35.6% if PVS2 was used. The cold pre-treatment on the mother plant did not significantly improve overall regrowth. The cryopreservation process did not decline the rooting ability of the recovered shoots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available