3.8 Article

Implementation context for addressing social needs in a learning health system: a qualitative study

Journal

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.842

Keywords

social determinants of health; electronic health records; implementation science; qualitative research

Funding

  1. University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  2. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implementation of a module that collects and integrates patient-reported social needs information into electronic health records faces challenges in terms of patients' discomfort in answering sensitive questions, concerns about privacy, and technological literacy. Establishing rapport with providers is important for patients to discuss social needs, while limited time with patients and lack of available community resources are barriers according to providers.
Introduction. Unmet social needs contribute to growing health disparities and rising health care costs. Strategies to collect and integrate information on social needs into patients' electronic health records (EHRs) show promise for connecting patients with community resources. However, gaps remain in understanding the contextual factors that impact implementing these interventions in clinical settings. Methods. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and focus groups with providers (January-September 2020) in two primary care clinics to inform the implementation of a module that collects and integrates patient-reported social needs information into the EHR. Questions addressed constructs within the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were coded deductively using team-based framework analysis, followed by inductive coding and matrix analyses. Results. Forty patients participated in interviews, with 20 recruited at the clinics and 20 from home. Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 12 providers. Factors salient to acceptability and feasibility included patients' discomfort answering sensitive questions, concerns about privacy, difficulty reading/understanding module content, and technological literacy. Rapport with providers was a facilitator for patients to discuss social needs. Providers stressed that limited time with patients would be a barrier, and expressed concerns about the lack of available community resources. Conclusion. Findings highlight the need for flexible approaches to assessing and discussing social needs with patients. Feasibility of the intervention is contingent upon support from the health system to facilitate social needs assessment and discussion. Further study of availability of community resources is needed to ensure intervention effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available