3.8 Proceedings Paper

XGBoost and Deep Neural Network Comparison: The Case of Teams' Performance

Journal

INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS (ITS 2021)
Volume 12677, Issue -, Pages 343-349

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_37

Keywords

Deep Neural Network; Machine learning; Comparison; XGBoost; Adamax; Team performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Team collaboration is crucial in educational settings, where machine learning algorithms play a significant role in addressing biases in predicting team performance. The study reveals that the XGBoost algorithm outperforms the Deep Neural Network in learning and predicting team performance, achieving higher accuracy rates.
In the educational setting, working in teams is considered an essential collaborative activity where various biases exist that influence the prediction of teams performance. To tackle this issue, machine learning algorithms can be properly explored and utilized. In this context, the main objective of the current paper is to explore the ability of the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and a Deep Neural Network (DNN) with 4 hidden layers to make predictions about the teams' performance. The major finding of the current paper is that shallow machine learning performed better learning and prediction results than the DNN. Specifically, the XGBoost learning accuracy was found to be 100% during teams learning and production phase, while its prediction accuracy was found to be 95.60% and 93.08%, respectively for the same phases. Similarly, the learning accuracy of the DNN was found to be 89.26% and 81.23%, while its prediction accuracy was found to be 80.50% and 77.36%, during the two phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available