4.8 Article

Swelling of a non-vascular-plant-inspired soft composite

Journal

MATTER
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 3991-4005

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.10.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1653676]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1653676] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that synthetic plant tissue analogs (PTAs) can mimic the closed-cell structure and osmotic actuation of non-vascular plant tissue, enabling the emergence of turgor-pressure-induced stiffness and leading to more forceful swelling deformations. PTAs consist of saltwater droplets embedded within PDMS walls, and reach equilibrium in water governed by initial osmolyte concentration and cell wall mechanical response.
Even without the aid of muscle, plant tissue drives large, forceful motion via osmosis-driven fluid flow. Hydrogels are well-known synthetic materials that mimic this osmotic mechanism to achieve large swelling deformations. However, hydrogels can be limited by a loss of stiffness as their swelling increases. Here we demonstrate that a synthetic plant tissue analog (PTA) can mimic the closed-cell structure and osmotic actuation of non-vascular plant tissue, enabling the emergence of turgor-pressure-induced stiffness and leading to more forceful swelling deformations. PTAs consist of micrometer sized saltwater droplets embedded within thin, highly stretchable, selectively permeable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) walls. When immersed in water, PTAs reach a state of equilibrium governed by the initial osmolyte concentration (higher produces more swelling) and cell wall mechanical response (stiffer and less stretchable yields less swelling). Given these behaviors, PTAs represent an alternate class of aqueous, autonomous synthetic materials that, like hydro gels, may benefit biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available