4.6 Article

Digital Technologies, Circular Economy Practices and Environmental Policies in the Era of COVID-19

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su132212790

Keywords

industry 4.0; circular economy; environmental regulations; manufacturing supply chains; COVID-19

Funding

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering [20210218]
  2. Prince Sultan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between industry 4.0 technologies, COVID-19 outbreak, environmental regulation policies, and circular economy practices. The results indicate that industry 4.0 technologies and environmental regulations are promoting circular economy practices during the pandemic, but there is no evidence supporting COVID-19 as a determining factor in the adoption of the circular economy.
The degradation of the environment is associated with economic activity, particularly with the linear way in which the economy does not make efficient use of resources. However, the circular economy is opposed to this linear paradigm, since it makes the most of the resources in trying to achieve zero waste. In this context, this study investigates the relationship between industry 4.0 technologies, COVID-19 outbreak, environmental regulation policies and circular economy practices. A questionnaire is designed to collect information from 214 big and private manufacturing firms in Ecuador, and subsequently, through CB-SEM, the information is processed, and the study paths are validated. The results suggest that industry 4.0 technologies and environmental regulation policies are driving circular economy practices during the pandemic. The study finds no evidence favoring COVID-19 being a determining factor in the adoption of the circular economy. The results provide a policy framework for the adoption of a circular economy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available