4.4 Review

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15330338211057983

Keywords

hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL); alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); histopathological characteristics; immunohistochemical staining; treatment; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Province Medical Science and Technology Project [2020ZH001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) is a rare malignant tumor with characteristics resembling hepatocellular carcinoma but originating from the lung. Current major treatments for HAL include complete surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, with some case reports suggesting potential benefits from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Due to its rarity, there is a lack of systematic and extensive statistical research on HAL.
Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) is an comparatively rare malignant tumor originating from the lung with shorter survival. HAL morphologically and pathologically exhibits hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-like characteristics, while its clinical features resemble pulmonary adenocarcinoma. High concentration of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is often detected in the serum of HAL patients with no hepatic occupying lesion. Patients with AFP-negative HAL survive a few months longer than those with positive AFP test. HAL is a rare type of carcinoma, so there is a lack of systematic and extensive statistical research. The treatment strategy for HAL is similar to common lung adenocarcinoma. Complete surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are the current major treatments for HAL patients. There are also a few of case reports suggesting that HAL patients may benefit from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This review focuses on the clinical and pathological features, immunohistochemical staining characteristics, treatment and prognosis of HAL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available