4.7 Article

Criticality and Griffiths phases in random games with quenched disorder

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brazilian Research Agency CNPq [428653/2018-9]
  2. FAPEMIG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, evolutionary game theory is used to model scenario with randomly perturbed payoffs, showing that payoff fluctuations induce slow dynamics and cooperation decay behaves as power laws. The emergence of Griffiths phase and symmetric Griffiths phase near defector's extinction point are observed, indicating their potential frequent occurrence in evolutionary game dynamics.
The perceived risk and reward for a given situation can vary depending on resource availability, accumulated wealth, and other extrinsic factors such as individual backgrounds. Based on this general aspect of everyday life, here we use evolutionary game theory to model a scenario with randomly perturbed payoffs in a prisoner's dilemma game. The perception diversity is modeled by adding a zero-average random noise in the payoff entries and a Monte Carlo simulation is used to obtain the population dynamics. This payoff heterogeneity can promote and maintain cooperation in a competitive scenario where only defectors would survive otherwise. In this work, we give a step further, understanding the role of heterogeneity by investigating the effects of quenched disorder in the critical properties of random games. We observe that payoff fluctuations induce a very slow dynamic, making the cooperation decay behave as power laws with varying exponents, instead of the usual exponential decay after the critical point, showing the emergence of a Griffiths phase. We also find a symmetric Griffiths phase near the defector's extinction point when fluctuations are present, indicating that Griffiths phases may be frequent in evolutionary game dynamics and play a role in the coexistence of different strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available