4.4 Article

Characterizing a Snapshot of Perceptual Experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
Volume 150, Issue 9, Pages 1695-1709

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000864

Keywords

vision; perception; attention; scenes; awareness

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Collaborative Research Award [1829470]
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  3. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1829470] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, researchers infer the nature of perceptual experience by examining objects not fully encoded within a scene. However, studies have shown that observers often fail to notice drastic changes to a scene, even when their attention is focused on it.
What can we perceive in a single glance of the visual world? Although this question appears rather simple, answering it has been remarkably difficult and controversial. Traditionally, researchers have tried to infer the nature of perceptual experience by examining how many objects and what types of objects are not fully encoded within a scene (e.g., failing to notice a bowl disappearing/changing). Here, we took a different approach and asked how much we could alter an entire scene before observers noticed those global alterations. Surprisingly, we found that observers could fixate on a scene for hundreds of milliseconds yet routinely fail to notice drastic changes to that scene (e.g., scrambling the periphery so no object can be identified, putting the center of 1 scene on the background of another scene). In addition, we also found that as observers allocate more attention to their periphery, their ability to notice these changes to a scene increases. Together, these results show that although a single snapshot of perceptual experience can be remarkably impoverished, it is also not a fixed constant and is likely to be continuously changing from moment to moment depending on attention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available