4.7 Article

The different fate of antibiotics in the Thames River, UK, and the Katsura River, Japan

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 1903-1913

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0523-z

Keywords

Antibiotics; Natural attenuation; Sorption; Sediment; Direct photolysis; Indirect photolysis

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of the Environment
  2. DEFRA
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [25257304, 23254003, 26257302]
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  5. NERC [ceh020014] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010, ceh020014] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26257302] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the mechanisms influencing the differences in attenuation of antibiotics between rivers. In this study, the natural attenuation of four antibiotics (azithromycin, clarithromycin, sulfapyridine, and sulfamethoxazole) during transport along the Thames River, UK, over a distance of 8.3 km, and the Katsura River, Japan, over a distance of 7.6 km was compared. To assist interpretation of the field data, the individual degradation and sorption characteristics of the antibiotics were estimated by laboratory experiments using surface water or sediment taken from the same rivers. Azithromycin, clarithromycin, and sulfapyridine were attenuated by 92, 48, and 11% in the Thames River stretch. The first-order decay constants of azithromycin and sulfapyridine were similar to those in the Katsura River, while that of clarithromycin was 4.4 times higher. For sulfamethoxazole, the attenuation was limited in both rivers. Loss of sulfapyridine was attributed to both direct and indirect photolysis in the Thames River, but to only direct photolysis in the Katsura River. Loss of azithromycin and clarithromycin was attributed to sorption to sediment in both rivers. The probable explanation behind the difference in loss rates of clarithromycin between the two rivers was considered to be sediment sorption capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available