4.6 Article

A Comparative Study of 2D and 3D Digital Image Correlation Approaches for the Characterization and Numerical Analysis of Composite Materials

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 160675-160687

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132393

Keywords

Cameras; Three-dimensional displays; Digital images; Correlation; Speckle; Mechanical factors; Composite materials; Carbon fiber reinforced polymer; composite; digital image correlation; finite element method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article compares different Digital Image Correlation methods to determine the main mechanical characteristics of composite materials, specifically Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. The study highlights the consistency of results when using 3D methods and non-planar specimens for evaluating mechanical properties, as opposed to differences in results with different configurations (2D and 3D). The significance of evaluating elastic properties may vary due to uncertainties in methods, but not reflected in probabilistic simulations.
This article makes a comparison between different Digital Image Correlation methods to determinate the main mechanical characteristics of composite materials. More specifically Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. For this purpose, several tensile tests were carried out using the same camera and lens model. Different statistical methods as well as probabilistic numerical simulations were performed with the aim of evaluating the discrepancies between methods, and between different mechanical parameters. We want to highlight the consistency of the results, enabling the possibility of using 3D methods with non-planar specimen for determining the mechanical properties of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. In this case, the novelty is focused on the use of different configurations (2D and 3D) to study the differences in terms of results. the objective is not the specific characterization of CFRP, but to analyze the way in which the use of a dataset from DIC3D or, on the contrary, from DIC2D affects the final results. According to this, it is possible to concluded that significative differences arise in the evaluation of the elastic properties that could be assigned to the uncertainties of the methods. However, this significance does not appear in the results of the probabilistic simulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available