3.8 Article

Exploring the Ethics of Implementation of Epigenomics Technologies in Cancer Screening: A Focus Group Study

Journal

EPIGENETICS INSIGHTS
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/25168657211063618

Keywords

Cancer or oncology; medical screening; focus group research; medical ethics; epigenomic technology; responsible innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New epigenomics technologies are showing promise in cancer detection and prediction, particularly in population screening. Understanding ethical and societal issues early on is crucial for assessing the moral acceptability of implementing these technologies in screening programs.
New epigenomics technologies are being developed and used for the detection and prediction of various types of cancer. By allowing for timely intervention or preventive measures, epigenomics technologies show promise for public health, notably in population screening. In order to assess whether implementation of epigenomics technologies in population screening may be morally acceptable, it is important to understand - in an early stage of development - ethical and societal issues that may arise. We held 3 focus groups with experts in science and technology studies (STS) (n = 13) in the Netherlands, on 3 potential future applications of epigenomic technologies in screening programmes of increasing scope: cervical cancer, female cancers and 'global' cancer. On the basis of these discussions, this paper identifies ethical issues pertinent to epigenomics-based population screening, such as risk communication, trust and public acceptance; personal responsibility, stigmatisation and societal pressure, and data protection and data governance. It also points out how features of epigenomics (eg, modifiability) and changing concepts (eg, of cancer) may challenge the existing evaluative framework for screening programmes. This paper aims to anticipate and prepare for future ethical challenges when epigenomics technologies can be tested and introduced in public health settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available