4.2 Review

Radiomics in surgical oncology: applications and challenges

Journal

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 85-96

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2021.1994014

Keywords

Radiomics; neoadjuvant; adjuvant; chemotherapy; machine learning; review; challenges in surgery

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support [P30 CA008748, NCI R01 CA233888]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgery combined with chemotherapy has shown promising results in certain cancer types, but there is still controversy over the optimal timing and patient selection for neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategies. Radiomics combined with machine learning has the potential to predict tumor behavior and response to therapy, but faces challenges such as lack of standardization in practices and limited data sharing that hinder its widespread adoption.
Surgery is a curative treatment option for many patients with malignant tumors. Increased attention has focused on the combination of surgery with chemotherapy, as multimodality treatment has been associated with promising results in certain cancer types. Despite these data, there remains clinical equipoise on optimal timing and patient selection for neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategies. Radiomics, an emerging field involving the extraction of advanced features from radiographic images, has the potential to revolutionize oncologic treatment and contribute to the advance of personalized therapy by helping predict tumor behavior and response to therapy. This review analyzes and summarizes studies that use radiomics with machine learning in patients who have received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy to predict prognosis, recurrence, survival, and therapeutic response for various cancer types. While studies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings demonstrate above average performance on ability to predict progression-free and overall survival, there remain many challenges and limitations to widespread implementation of this technology. The lack of standardization of common practices to analyze radiomics, limited data sharing, and absence of auto-segmentation have hindered the inclusion and rapid adoption of radiomics in prospective, clinical studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available