Journal
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00436-w
Keywords
Knee arthroplasty; Revision arthroplasty; Clinical outcomes; Patient reported outcome measures
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined recovery trajectories in revision knee arthroplasty patients over 12 months, identifying four different trajectories and demonstrating differences in pain, function, and quality of life among groups. Late and prolonged improvement groups showed improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures at 12 months, while the early improvement group did not report improvement in daily physical functioning but showed improvements in function and pain during activity.
Purpose Despite good survival rates of revised knee prostheses, little is known about recovery trajectories within the first 12 months after surgery. This retrospective observational study explored recovery trajectories in terms of pain, function and quality of life in patients after revision knee arthroplasty over 12 months. Methods Eighty-eight revision knee arthroplasty patients rated changes in daily physical functioning using the anchor question (0: very much worsened; 7: very much improved). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain (range 0-10), function (Oxford Knee Score) and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) were assessed preoperatively, at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Four recovery trajectories were identified using the anchor question at 3 and 12 months postoperatively: no improvement, late improvement, early improvement, and prolonged improvement. Repeated measures ANOVA was conducted with recovery trajectories as dependent variable and PROM assessments as independent variables. Results Sixty percent reported improvement in daily physical functioning at 12 months postoperatively. Age and reason for revision differed between groups. Pain, function and EQ-5D-3L differed between groups over time. Late and prolonged improvement groups improved on all PROMs at 12 months. The early improvement group did not report improvement in daily physical functioning at 12 months, while improvements in function and pain during activity were observed. Conclusions Different recovery trajectories seem to exist and mostly match PROMs scores over time. Not all patients may experience beneficial outcome of revision knee arthroplasty. These findings are of importance to provide appropriate information on possible recovery trajectories after revision knee arthroplasty to patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available