4.3 Article

Economic analysis of pesticide expenditure for managing the invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) by maize farmers in Karnataka, India

Journal

CURRENT SCIENCE
Volume 121, Issue 11, Pages 1487-1492

Publisher

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v121/i11/1487-1492

Keywords

Economic analysis; fall armyworm; maize farmers; pesticide expenditure; yield

Funding

  1. University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that maize farmers in Karnataka used a high frequency of pesticide sprays to manage fall armyworm, highlighting the importance of integrated pest management to reduce pesticide use, protect the environment, and safeguard the income and livelihood of smallholder farmers.
The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) invaded India for the first time in May 2018 in Karnataka and since then has threatened maize production in the country. In this study conducted during 2017-2020, a total of 150 smallholder maize farms were randomly selected and surveyed from three major maize-growing districts in Karnataka for the pesticide usage patterns, pesticide cost and yield. During 2020, FAW infestation level was recorded at 2.15 larvae per 100 plants with an overall Davis damage score of 3.80. Maize farmers used on an average 2.12 pesticide sprays per season for FAW management in the surveyed districts in 2020. Maize yield was 4.46, 3.76, 4.06 and 4.18 tonnes per hectare in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 respectively, and the average cost on pesticides spent by farmers per 100 kg maize grain during the same years was US$ 0.124, US$ 2.04, US$ 1.68 and US$ 1.39 respectively. The study highlights the effect of FAW invasion on pest management re-gime in the maize crops of Karnataka. Integrated pest management is the need of the hour to reduce the en-vironmental impact of synthetic pesticides use and to protect the incomes and livelihood of the smallholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available