4.5 Article

Mechanical performance of concrete reinforced with polypropylene fibers (PPFs)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERED FIBERS AND FABRICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/15589250211060399

Keywords

Polypropylene fiber; workability; fresh density; compressive strength; split tensile strength; flexure cracking behavior

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [RGP. 2/71/42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the performance of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete through various tests, concluding that adding PPF can improve the concrete's ductility, first crack load, and maximum crack width. Results showed that fresh properties and mechanical strength of the concrete were optimal with a 2.0% addition of PPF.
Fibers are one of the most prevalent methods to enhance the tensile capacity of concrete. Most researchers focus on steel fiber reinforced concrete which is costly and easily corroded. This study aims to examine the performance of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete through different tests. PPFs were added into concrete blends in a percentage of 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0%, and 4.0% by weight of cement to offset its objectionable brittle nature and improve its tensile capacity. The fresh property was evaluated through slump cone test and while mechanical strength was evaluated through compressive strength, split tensile strength flexure strength, and flexure cracking behaviors after 7-, 14-, and 28-days curing. Results indicate that slump decrease with the addition of PPFs while fresh density increase up to 2.0% in addition to PPFs and then decreases. Similarly, strength (compressive strength; split tensile strength, and flexure strength) was increased up to 2.0% addition of PPFs and then decrease gradually. It also suggests that Ductility; first crack load, maximum crack width, and load-deflection inter-relations were considerably improved due to incorporations of PPFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available