4.7 Article

Hunting for tetraquarks in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 104, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0009988]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020169696, PP00P2_176884]
  3. National Center of Competence in Research SwissMAP
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [754496]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions are ideal for searching for exotic hadrons, focusing on compact tetraquark model states. The X(6900) is a promising candidate, with estimated production cross sections depending on its quantum numbers. The completion of a flavor-spin multiplet would strongly support the compact tetraquark model.
Ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions constitute an ideal setup to look for exotic hadrons because of their low event multiplicity and the possibility of an efficient background rejection. We propose to look for fourquark states produced by photon-photon fusion in these collisions at the center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair root s(NN) = 5.5 TeV. In particular, we focus on those states that would represent a definite smoking gun for the compact tetraquark model. We show that the X(6900), a likely cc (c) over bar(c) over bar compact state, is a perfect candidate for this search, and estimate a production cross section ranging from around 250 nb to 1150 nb, depending on its quantum numbers. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of ultraperipheral collisions to the search for the scalar and tensor partners of the X(3872) predicted by the diquarkonium model, and not yet observed. The completion of such a flavor-spin multiplet would speak strongly in favor of the compact tetraquark model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available