4.6 Article

A Miniaturized Triple-Band and Dual-Polarized Monopole Antenna Based on a CSRR Perturbed Ground Plane

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 164292-164299

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134497

Keywords

Complementary split ring resonators (CSRR); monopole antenna; triple-band; dual-polarization; miniaturization

Funding

  1. [PID2019-109984RB-C41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new triple-band monopole antenna utilizing modified ground plane with Complementary Split Ring Resonators (CSRR) to independently control operational bands and achieve dual-polarization performance. The antenna design is compact and demonstrates good performance across multiple frequency bands with measurements aligning closely with simulations.
This paper proposes a new triple-band monopole antenna based on Complementary Split Ring Resonators (CSRR) perturbing the ground plane (GND). The antenna consists of an inverted-L-shaped monopole fed by a modified microstrip line with two CSRRs cut out of the ground plane. The operational bands are independently controlled by the CSRR unit cell parameters. In addition, the antenna presents a dual-polarization performance (vertical polarization at 2.4 GHz band and horizontal polarization at both 3.6 and 5.9 GHz bands). The designed antenna is fully planar and low profile avoiding the vias with the ground plane and covering the WLAN, WiMAX, and IEEE 801.11p bands at 2.45, 3.6, and 5.8 GHz. A compact prototype (0.32 lambda(0) x 0.32 lambda(0) being lambda(0) is the wavelength corresponding to the lowest resonance frequency) has been fabricated and measured showing good agreement between simulations and measurements. The measured impedance bandwidths are 10% (2.38-2.63 GHz), 2.5% (3.54-3.63 GHz), and 20% (5.83-7.12 GHz) whereas the measured gains are 1.34, 0.68, and 2.65 dBi at 2.4, 3.6, and 5.9 GHz respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available