3.8 Proceedings Paper

Comparative evaluation of hole making processes in magnesium alloy AZ31 under dry machining condition

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 4356-4361

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.662

Keywords

Helical hole milling; Conventional drilling; Surface roughness; Cutting force; Temperature; Hole diameter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The helical hole milling process showed better hole quality in terms of diametrical accuracy and surface finish, as well as lower cutting forces and temperature compared to traditional drilling process. Additionally, the smaller chips generated during helical hole milling process facilitated easier evacuation compared to drilling process.
Hole making is an important process in manufacturing industries. Usually conventional drilling process is used for making holes. However recently a newer hole making process has gained importance due to several advantages it possesses. In this work, a comparative evaluation between conventional drilling with the newer helical milling process for making holes in Magnesium alloy AZ31 has been carried out. The two processes were analyzed considering the cutting forces, surface roughness, hole diameter and cutting temperature. In addition, the formation of burrs and chip morphology were studied. The hole quality in terms of diametrical accuracy and surface finish was found to be better when helical hole milling process was used. The generated cutting forces and temperature were found to be lower when holes were generated using helical milling process. The chips produced during the hole milling process were smaller which helped in easy evacuation as compared to drilling process. The results show that the helical hole milling process is a promising alternative for conventional hole drilling process. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available