4.4 Article

Lipid measurements in the management of cardiovascular diseases: Practical recommendations a scientific statement from the national lipid association writing group

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 629-648

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2021.09.046

Keywords

LDL cholesterol; HDL cholesterol; Non-HDL cholesterol; Apolipoprotein B; Bioimarkers; Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; Laboratory; Scientific statement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measurement of lipoproteins is crucial for managing patients with coronary heart disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Guidelines for lipid measurements have evolved to optimize cardiovascular risk assessment and prevention. Screening with nonfasting lipids is acceptable, and the use of non-HDL-C and alternative methods for estimating LDL-C are recommended, especially for patients with specific lipid profiles. Harmonization of advanced lipid measurement methods and timely follow-up after changes in lipid treatment are also emphasized for better clinical outcomes.
Lipoprotein measurements are pivotal in the management of patients at risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) with myocardial infarction and coronary death as the main outcomes, and for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes CHD and stroke. Recent developments and changes in guidelines affect optimization of using lipid measures as cardiovascular biomarkers. This scientific statement reviews the pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical, and clinical aspects of lipoprotein measurements. Highlights include the following: i) It is acceptable to screen with nonfasting lipids. ii) non-high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is measured reliably in either the fasting or the nonfasting state and can effectively guide ASCVD prevention. iii) low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can be estimated from total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL C), and triglyceride (TG) measurements. For patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL and TG <= 150 mg/dL it is reasonable to use the Friedewald formula. However, for those with TG 150-400 mg/dL the Friedewald formula for LDL-C estimation is less accurate. The Martin/Hopkins method is recommended for LDL-C estimation throughout the range of LDL-C levels and up to TG levels of 399 mg/dL. For TG levels >= 400 mg/dL LDL-C estimating equations are currently not recommended and newer methods are being evaluated. iv) When LDL-C or TG screening results are abnormal the clinician should consider obtaining fasting lipids. v) Advanced lipoprotein tests using apolipoprotein B (apoB), LDL Particle Number (LDL-P) or remnant cholesterol may help to guide therapeutic decisions in select patients, but data are limited for patients already on lipid lowering therapy with low LDL-C levels. Better harmonization of advanced lipid measurement methods is needed. Lipid measurements are recommended 4-12 weeks after a change in lipid treatment. Lipid laboratory reports should denote desirable values and specifically identify extremely elevated LDL-C levels (>= 190 mg/dL at any age or >= 160 mg/dL in children) as severe hypercholesterolemia. Potentially actionable abnormal lipid test results, including fasting triglycerides (TG) >= 500 mg/dL, should be reported as hypertriglyceridemia. Appropriate use and reporting of lipid tests should improve their utility in the management of persons at high risk for ASCVD events. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of National Lipid Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available